Opinion

Anderson, Adm'x. Et Vir v. Armstrong

  • 132 Tex. 122
  • 120 S.W.2d 444
  • 1938 Tex. LEXIS 229
Court
Texas Supreme Court
Filed
Oct 26, 1938
Status
Published
On the bench
German
Cited by
19 cases

breach of fiduciary duty

How later courts described this case

  • breach of fiduciary duty

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

The plaintiff in error, having, in response to order of this Court heretofore entered, filed bond in accordance with the statute in such cases made and provided, we have again carefully reviewed and considered this case, in the light of the motions for rehearing filed herein, and are of the opinion that the conclusions reached herein, as shown by the opinion on file, is correct, and all motions for rehearing are overruled.

Opinion delivered January 4, 1939.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.