“The strict rule with reference to direct and rebuttal testimony is not enforced in this state in the trial of criminal cases . . . .”
How later courts described this case
- “The strict rule with reference to direct and rebuttal testimony is not enforced in this state in the trial of criminal cases . . . .”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Appellant, by his affidavit in writing, has signified his desire to withdraw his motion for rehearing in the above styled cause.
We learn from the counsel for the appellant that they make no objection to the granting of the request.
The request, to withdraw the motion for rehearing is therefore granted, and mandate will issue upon the original judgment of affirmance.
Motion withdrawn.