Opinion

Porch v. State

  • 51 Tex. Crim. 7
  • 99 S.W. 1122
  • 1907 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Feb 13, 1907
Status
Published
Author
Davidson
On the bench
Brooks, Davidson
Cited by
23 cases
Authority
More cited than 2.0%

Sureties “are primarily responsible ... for all the costs accruing in this court. This, it would appear, must be governed by the rules regulating costs in civil cases.”

How later courts described this case

  • Sureties “are primarily responsible ... for all the costs accruing in this court. This, it would appear, must be governed by the rules regulating costs in civil cases.”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge

(dissenting).—I dissent from the views of the majority in regard to the constitutional provision, which re

*12

quires that the -accused shall be confronted with the witnesses against him. My views have been to a very large extent expressed in Cline’s case, 36 Texas Crim. Rep., 320 , to which I refer for some of the reasons for my dissent in this case. If time affords, I may file reasons in this case for my dissent, other than those set out in Cline’s case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.