Opinion

Odom v. State

  • 129 Tex. Crim. 227
  • 86 S.W.2d 225
  • 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 423
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 12, 1935
Status
Published
Author
Morrow
On the bench
Lattimore, Morrow
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

A review of the record in the light of the motion for rehearing leaves us of the opinion that the diligence to secure the absent testimony was not sufficient. Deeming the proper disposition of the case to have been made on the original hearing, the motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.