Opinion

Smart v. State

  • 133 Tex. Crim. 155
  • 109 S.W.2d 179
  • 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 471
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jun 9, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Hawkins
On the bench
Morrow, Hawkins, Lattimore
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge. —

Appellant’s motion for rehearing stresses the point that we were in error in sustaining the trial court’s action in overruling the motion for change of venue.

There having been a difference of opinion among the members of the court on such question originally the matter was given consideration before our opinion of affirmance was released. In view of appellant’s motion, however, the evidence upon the hearing of the motion for change of venue has again been reviewed. Such' evidence, we think, sustains the conclusions reached in our opinion affirming the judgment. To write further would be only restating in different language those conclusions.

*160

We do not believe the other points urged in the motion call for further discussion.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

Overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.