Opinion

Ex Parte Zuccaro

  • 72 Tex. Crim. 214
  • 162 S.W. 844
  • 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 621
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Dec 10, 1913
Status
Published
Author
Davidson
On the bench
Davidson, Prendergast
Cited by
14 cases

dismissing habeas petition without prejudice where relator was confined for violation of an injunction in a civil case because "it was intended that the Supreme Court should first be given an opportunity to take jurisdiction in such matters as are provided for by [the statute granting this Court habeas corpus jurisdiction]"

How later courts described this case

  • dismissing habeas petition without prejudice where relator was confined for violation of an injunction in a civil case because "it was intended that the Supreme Court should first be given an opportunity to take jurisdiction in such matters as are provided for by [the statute granting this Court habeas corpus jurisdiction]"
  • observing that the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in criminal cases and has no jurisdiction in "civil cases of any character"

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge

(dissenting.)—We have heard the application on oral argument after authorizing filing the application, and ought to dispose of the ease. Our authority to do so is constitutional.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.