collection of urine specimen over defendant’s objection violates Article I, 10, supra
How later courts described this case
- collection of urine specimen over defendant’s objection violates Article I, 10, supra
- urine sample, demonstrative acts
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
ON STATE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.
The State has filed an able motion for rehearing challenging the correctness of the conclusions announced in our original opinion.
We have re-examined the record in the light of the State’s motion, and are inclined to adhere to the conclusions heretofore announced.
We think the safer policy to be adherence to the construction and application of Section 10, Article 1 of our Constitution already given effect in our long-established precedents.
We are not inclined to enlarge upon accepted exemptions from the application of said provision of the Constitution.
The motion for rehearing is overruled.