Opinion

Silver v. State

  • 110 Tex. Crim. 512
  • 8 S.W.2d 144
  • 60 A.L.R. 290
  • 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 661
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jan 11, 1928
Status
Published
Author
Lattimore
On the bench
Morrow, Christian, Hawkins, Lattimore
Cited by
62 cases

The opinion

CONCURRING OPINION ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

While this court is of opinion, as expressed by its Presiding Judge in connection herewith, that we can not consider an application for leave to file second motion for rehearing, which is filed after adjournment of this court, still in view of the fact that appellant was given the extreme penalty of the law, we desire to say that we have examined his application and that in our opinion it presents nothing which was overlooked by the court in considering the matter originally or upon the motion for rehearing. The four points presented in connection with this application were each and all passed upon by the court. We must adhere to the rule that we will not consider second motions for rehearing even presented during the term, when they only present matters which have already been passed upon.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.