stating that it is "the duly of eveiy peace officer to preserve the peace within his jurisdiction!;]” thus, relying on "suspicious places” statute, "he shall use all lawful means ... [to] interfere, without warrant, to prevent or suppress crime”
How later courts described this case
- stating that it is "the duly of eveiy peace officer to preserve the peace within his jurisdiction!;]” thus, relying on "suspicious places” statute, "he shall use all lawful means ... [to] interfere, without warrant, to prevent or suppress crime”
- stating that it is "the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within his jurisdiction]" thus, relying on "suspicious places" statute, "he shall use all lawful means ... [to] interfere, without warrant, to prevent or suppress crime"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
I respectfully dissent.