Opinion

Jackson v. State

  • 117 Tex. Crim. 51
  • 35 S.W.2d 409
  • 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 276
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Jan 21, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Lattimore
On the bench
Lattimore, Calhoun
Cited by
2 cases

The opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Solely on the ground that the evidence did not support the judgment, appellant moves for a rehearing. In a written statement made and signed by him shortly after the occurrence, he admitted the assault, but affirmed that he thought the woman in the case was his wife, and that after he had struck her a few blows, upon discovery that she was a white woman, he ran away. The extent as well as the purpose of the assault were fact conclusions placed by statute within the province of the jury and seldom disturbed by us, and then only when we find either no substantial support for the verdict, or else are led to believe it influenced by passion or prejudice. Such is not the case here.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

Overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.