Opinion

Lutz v. State

  • 146 Tex. Crim. 503
  • 176 S.W.2d 317
  • 1943 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 661
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Nov 17, 1943
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Graves
Cited by
14 cases

The opinion

Appellant files an exhaustive motion for a rehearing, which is but, in the main, a reiteration of his contentions in his original brief herein. It would serve no useful purpose in writing upon matters set forth in the original opinion. *Page 509

We have again gone over the record carefully, and see no reason to change our views relative thereto.

The motion will therefore be overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.