Opinion

Ex Parte Bartee

  • 76 Tex. Crim. 285
  • 174 S.W. 1051
  • 1915 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Mar 3, 1915
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper
Cited by
15 cases

The opinion

I said in the recent case of McCallen v. State, decided by Presiding Judge Prendergast, that I thought the Juvenile Act was not intelligible to such extent that it ought to be held inoperative. The incongruities are made the more apparent by each succeeding opinion which upholds it.

[Rehearing denied March 31, 1915. — Reporter.]

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.