Opinion

Ex Parte Wolters

  • 64 Tex. Crim. 238
  • 144 S.W. 531
  • 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 610
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Dec 6, 1911
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, Harper, Prendergast
Cited by
25 cases

noting that the Legislature is generally confined to legislative matters and "in no instance" can it act as a judicial branch of government unless such power is expressly conferred upon it by the Constitution

How later courts described this case

  • noting that the Legislature is generally confined to legislative matters and "in no instance" can it act as a judicial branch of government unless such power is expressly conferred upon it by the Constitution
  • unlike Texas, the English government was never “divided into three separate and distinct departments, with the limitation that no one of the departments should exercise the power attached to the other department”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

I do not agree with the opinion of Judge Davidson that the motion for rehearing should be dismissed, but think the motion to strike out the motion for rehearing should be overruled. For my views on this question see the case of Ex parte Gray this day decided. I am of the opinion, however, that the motion for rehearing should be overruled.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.