Opinion

Fitch v. State

  • 58 Tex. Crim. 366
  • 127 S.W. 1040
  • 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Filed
Mar 2, 1910
Status
Published
On the bench
Davidson, McCORD, Ramsey
Cited by
43 cases

The opinion

Opinion is correct holding indictment insufficient. The court ought to have held the case within the rule laid down in Lewis v. State, decided at present term. The principle enunciated in that case is the same as in this case. That case being correct beyond question, should have reversed this case on the proposition the law discussed in this case can not operate in any local option territory until the voters thereof voted on the law and put it into operation subsequent to the enactment of this law. I concur in reversal and dismissal of this prosecution on insufficiency of the indictment, but dissent from the opinion insofar as it does not follow Lewis v. State, and will write further views later.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.