Opinion

Greene v. Brown

  • 199 S.C. 218
  • 19 S.E.2d 114
  • 1942 S.C. LEXIS 39
Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Filed
Mar 9, 1942
Status
Published
On the bench
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BONHAM.
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 83.4%

The opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 220

March 9, 1942. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

This case was heard on Circuit by the Honorable E.H. Henderson, Judge of the Second Circuit. His decree evinces that he gave to its study and preparation meticulous care and serious consideration. His findings of fact and conclusions *Page 233

of law are amply sustained by our study of his decree. It would be a work of supererogation for us to add anything to it.

We concur in his expression of regret that the plaintiff cannot recover in this case, due to his failure to give notice in writing to Mrs. Brown, the owner of the house being built, that he was furnishing materials being used in the construction of the house. His failure to give that notice deprived him of the benefit of the lien provided for in Section 8729 of the Code of South Carolina for 1932. This, however, does not entitle him to recover of Mrs. Brown the value of the articles furnished by him. He must look to the contractor to whom he sold the articles.

Let the decree of Judge Henderson be reported. Exceptions are overruled and the judgment affirmed.

MESSRS. ASSOCIATE JUSTICES BAKER, FISHBURNE and STUKES and CIRCUIT JUDGE WM. H. GRIMBALL, ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.