Opinion

Mishoe v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

  • 186 S.C. 402
  • 197 S.E. 97
  • 1938 S.C. LEXIS 65
Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Filed
Mar 16, 1938
Status
Published
Author
Bonham
On the bench
Ci-Iiee, Stabrer, Kishburne, Johnson, Stabler, Fishburne, Messrs, Bonham, Baker, Carter
Cited by
47 cases

noting the appellate "court looks to the substance and not to the shadows" in evaluating points raised on appeal

How later courts described this case

  • noting the appellate "court looks to the substance and not to the shadows" in evaluating points raised on appeal
  • noting "[t]his court looks to the substance and not to the shadows" when evaluating issues raised to it
  • appellate courts in this state are “confined to a disposition of appeals upon the exceptions taken ...”
  • elements of damage in wrongful death action

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*439

Dissenting Order on Petition eor Rehearing

Mr. Justice Bonham

: For the reasons stated in the first opinion filed in this case; in the dissenting opinion filed following the reargument, and in the petition for another rehearing now being passed upon, it is our opinion that the petition should be granted.

Mr. Justice Baker concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.