Opinion

Salley v. McCoy

  • 182 S.C. 249
  • 189 S.E. 196
  • 1936 S.C. LEXIS 31
Court
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Filed
Dec 9, 1936
Status
Published
Author
Bonham
On the bench
Stabler, Messrs, Bonham, Baker, Fisi-Iburne, Gaston, Eisi-Iburne
Cited by
34 cases
Authority
More cited than 1.0%

The opinion

Mr. Justice Bonham

(concurring) : I concur that this Court is bound by its decision in the case of

Holt v. Calhoun et al.,

175 S. C., 381, 179 S. E., 501 . With that case still of force, I am constrained by the opinion declared in it to concur in Mr. Justice Baker’s opinion in the present case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.