Opinion

Potts Et Ux. v. Guthrie

  • 282 Pa. 200
  • 127 A. 605
  • 1925 Pa. LEXIS 596
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Dec 3, 1924
Status
Published
Author
Schaefer
On the bench
Schaefer, Moschzisker, Frazer, Walling, Simpson, Sadler, Schaeeer
Cited by
23 cases

husband recovered damages for wife’s inability to bear children

How later courts described this case

  • husband recovered damages for wife’s inability to bear children

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefer:

The size of verdicts which are being found in actions for damages for personal injury and death are becoming challenging in their proportions. Many of them would seem to embody the element of punishment in addition to compensation. The trial judge is as much a part of the tribunal created by the law to administer justice as is the jury and in cases of this kind he should be alert to see that sound judgment backs the finding of damages rather than feeling or prejudice. ■ If he fails to bring wise judgment to the determination of this most important question, the court in banc should strike down awards which are more than fairly compensatory. Being of opinion that the findings for both husband and wife in this case were much in excess of what they are fairly entitled to, I dissent from the affirmance of the judgments.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.