Opinion

Pigrenet v. Boland Marine

  • 636 F.2d 1107
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 20707
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Filed
Jan 26, 1981
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

636 F.2d 1107

Robert L. PIGRENET, Sr., Petitioner,

v.

BOLAND MARINE & MANUFACTURING COMPANY and The Director of

the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs of

the Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 79-1782.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 26, 1981.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board (louisiana case).

Pitard, Pitard & Porobil, Michael L. Lash, New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

Stewart E. Niles, Jr., Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere & Denegre, New Orleans, La., for Boland Marine, etc.

Mary A. Sheehan, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Director, O. W. C. P.

(Opinion Dec. 3, 1980, 5 Cir., 631 F.2d 1190 )

Before COLEMAN, Chief Judge, BROWN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CHARLES CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, VANCE, KRAVITCH, FRANK M. JOHNSON, Jr., GARZA, HENDERSON, REAVLEY, POLITZ, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, RANDALL, TATE, SAM D. JOHNSON, THOMAS A. CLARK, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A majority of the Judges in active service, on the Court's own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.