Opinion

National Surety Corp. v. Smith

  • 168 Or. 265
  • 123 P.2d 203
  • 114 P.2d 118
  • 1941 Ore. LEXIS 51
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 19, 1941
Status
Published
Author
Bailey
On the bench
Kelly, Rand, Bailey, Belt, Rossman, Lusk, Brand
Cited by
21 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.5%

assignee of sher- iff’s certificate of sale received sheriff’s deed

How later courts described this case

  • assignee of sher- iff’s certificate of sale received sheriff’s deed

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

BAILEY, J.

(specially concurring). In view of the fact that the tax foreclosure proceedings here involved were held void by this court in

Smith v. Carlson,

160 Or. 383 , 85 P. (2d) 1028 , I concur in the result announced in the opinion of Mr. Justice Rossman. I particularly concur, also, in the construction of § 69-845, Oregon Code 1930, as a statute of limitation and not of prescription.

*285

Robin I). Bay,

of Salem, for appellant.

Roy Harland,

of Salem (W. C. Winslow, of Salem, on the brief), for respondents Smith.

Walter H. Bell,

of Stayton, and

Carson S Carson,

of Salem, for respondents Ogle.

Hesse & Franciscovich,

of Astoria, amicus curiae.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.