Opinion

Cunningham v. Oklahoma City

  • 188 Okla. 466
  • 110 P.2d 1102
  • 1941 OK 56
  • 1941 Okla. LEXIS 38
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Feb 15, 1941
Status
Published
Author
Riley
On the bench
Welch, Corn, Gibson, Hurst, Riley
Cited by
5 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.4%

The opinion

RILEY, J.

I concur herein, expressing no opinion on the issue of the sale of the bonds involved, upon a chilled market, pending litigation concerning validity of the bonds. That question is not now before us, but judges cannot be blind to that which everyone knows, especially upon questions publici juris.

Everyone may know there is now a third action which may present the question not now before us. It may present an issue of law depending upon facts occurring subsequent to those of record by which we measured the issues in Henry v. City of Oklahoma City, 188 Okla. 308 , 108 P. 2d 148 , and by which we measure the cause this day determined.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.