Opinion

Board of Equalization v. Tulsa Pythian Benevolent Ass'n

  • 195 Okla. 458
  • 158 P.2d 904
  • 1945 OK 162
  • 1945 Okla. LEXIS 396
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
May 22, 1945
Status
Published
Author
Hurst
On the bench
Arnold, Bayless, Davison, Gibson, Hurst, Osborn, Riley, Welch
Cited by
14 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.4%

The opinion

HURST, V.C.J.,

I dissent to the majority decision insofar as it applies the rule of prospective operation in the Queen City Lodge case ( 195 Okla. 131 , 156 P. 2d 340 ) to the year 1945, for the reason given in my opinion in that case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.