Opinion

Sparks v. State

  • 72 Okla. Crim. 283
  • 115 P.2d 277
  • 1941 OK CR 100
  • 1941 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 100
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Filed
Jul 9, 1941
Status
Published
Author
Jones
On the bench
Barefoot, Jones, Doyle
Cited by
10 cases

The opinion

JONES, J.

(concurring). I concur in the. conclusion reached by Judge BABEFOOT; however, if the appeal herein had been by case-made and there was evidence in the record supporting the contention of the defendant that the order of the Board of Barber Examiners

*292

was arbitrary and unreasonable and made without any regard to what minimum price was reasonably necessary in order for the barbers in Cushing to conduct a clean and sanitary barbershop, it is my opinion that the case would have had to have been reversed for failure of the trial court to give proper instructions submitting this issue to the jury; but under the state of the record, and in the light of the prior decisions of this court, the opinion affirming’ the judgment of the lower court is correct.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.