Opinion

Barell Food Stores, Inc. v. Bennett

  • 194 Okla. 508
  • 153 P.2d 106
  • 1944 OK 78
  • 1944 Okla. LEXIS 518
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Feb 15, 1944
Status
Published
On the bench
Corn, Osborn, Bay-Less, Hurst, Arnold, Gibson, Riley, Welch, Davison
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.4%

The opinion

On Rehearing.

PER CURIAM.

On petition for rehearing it is suggested that the Ohio case of Higbee Co. v. Jackson, cited and relied upon in our original opinion, has been overruled by the Ohio Supreme Court in the later case of Union Gas & Elec. Co. v. Crouch, 123 Ohio St. 81 , 174 N. E. 6 , 74 A. L. R. 160. While paragraphs 1 and 2 of the syllabus were expressly overruled therein, the former case has been followed in several states, and we think the reasoning of the Hig-bee Case is sound. In view of our holdings in similár cases cited and relied upon in our original opinion, including Empire Refining Co. v. Rawlings, 178 Okla. 391 , 62 P. 2d 1253 , not cited therein, we adhere to our original opinion.

Rehearing denied.

CORN, C.J., and OSBORN, BAY-LESS, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V.C.J., and RILEY and WELCH, JJ., dissent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.