Opinion

Brough v. Excise Board of Muskogee County

  • 153 Okla. 272
  • 5 P.2d 744
  • 1931 OK 743
  • 1931 Okla. LEXIS 457
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 1, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Riley
On the bench
Riley, Lester, Hefner, Cullison, Swindall, Andrews, Kornegay, Clark, Meneill
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.4%

The opinion

RILEY, J.

Under stipulations of the parties to this appeal, all the questions involved have heretofore been disposed of except the one raised as to the sufficiency of the title to chapter 7, S. L. 1927, wherein it is contended that said act is unconstitutional for the reasons stated, that the title makes no mention of a tax levy for library funds in cities and towns in excess of the six-mill levy allowed by law for current expenses.

The parties also stipulate that the latter question being raised in cause No. 21343, Protest of Taxpayers of Muskogee County. Brooks v. State et al., decided Oct. 6, 1931, 152 Okla. 119 , 3 P. (2d) 814 , the decision herein is to follow the decision in that case.

The question raised having been determined adversely to protestants, the judgment and order of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed, and paragraph 3 of the syllabus in cause No. 21343, supra, is adopted as the syllabus herein.

LESTER, C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, Y. C. J., and MeNEILL, J., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.