Opinion

Smart v. Board of County Com'rs of Craig County

  • 67 Okla. 141
  • 169 P. 1101
  • 1917 OK 590
  • 1917 Okla. LEXIS 367
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 11, 1917
Status
Published
Author
Thacker
On the bench
Hardy, Thacker
Cited by
71 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.3%

finding that Okla.Const. art. X, § 26, otherwise restricting county expenditures to monies levied for the fiscal year did not bar a claim for the cost of feeding the jail prisoners though monies budgeted for that purpose had been exhausted

How later courts described this case

  • finding that Okla.Const. art. X, § 26, otherwise restricting county expenditures to monies levied for the fiscal year did not bar a claim for the cost of feeding the jail prisoners though monies budgeted for that purpose had been exhausted
  • holding that a sheriff's lawful expenditure of money to feed prisoners in the discharge of duties imposed upon the sheriff by the Constitution and state laws constitutes a valid charge against the county

Written by the judges who cited it.

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Kurn v. Helm, 182 Okla. 260 (1938)

    Defendant further urges that the rule announced in the case of Smartt, Sheriff, v. Board of Com’rs of Craig County (1917) 67 Okla. 141, 169 P. 1101, is inapplicable.
    Supreme Court of OklahomaMar 15, 1938Read it

The opinion

THACKER, J.

(dissenting). I appreciate the force of the reasons for the opinion of the court; but I dissent for reasons stated in Campbell v. State ex rel. Brett, County Attorney, 23 Okla. 109 , 99 Pac. 778 , in Shannon v. State ex rel. Davidson, 33 Okla. 293 , 125 Pac. 1106 , in Buxton & Skinner Stationery Co. v. Board of County Commissioners of Craig County, 53 Okla. 65 , 155 Pac. 215 , in Kerr, County Clerk, v. State ex rel. Wimbish, County Attorney, 33 Okla. 110 , 124 Pac. 284 , and, especially, for reasons stated in State ex rel. Decker v. Stanfield, 34 Okla. 524 , 126 Pac. 239 , which case finds ample support in Board of County Commissioners of the County of Lake v. Rollins, 130 U. S. 662 , 9 Sup. Ct. 651, 32 L. Ed. 1060 , Wis. Cent. R. Co. v. Taylor Co., 52 Wis. 37 , 8 N. W. 833 , and Grand Island & N. W. R. Co. v. Baker, 6 Wyo. 369 , 45 Pac. 494 , 34 L. R. A. 835, 71 Am. St. Rep. 926 , cited by

*146

Commissioner Bleakmore in the original but now rejected opinion in this ease, reported in 158 Pac. 601 , L. R. A. 1916F, 892, which I think is correct.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.