Opinion

Wentz v. Thomas

159 Okla. 124
15 P.2d 65
1932 OK 636
1932 Okla. LEXIS 591

Court: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed: Sep 23, 1932
Status: Published
Author: Savindall
On the bench: Savindall, Hefner, Andreiavs, Cullison, Lester, Oullhson, Swin-Dall, McNeill, Kornegay, Clark, Riley, Andrews
Cited by: 28 cases

explaining that the Governor’s general removal power may be limited by express statutory provisions proscribing a different specific removal process

How later courts described this case

explaining that the Governor’s general removal power may be limited by express statutory provisions proscribing a different specific removal process

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

SAVINDALL, J.

I concur in the views expressed in the special concurring opinion of Mr. Justice RILEY for the reason that I feel that the elaboration by him may be the means of preventing other actions being commenced in this court.

CULLISON, X, concurs.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.