Opinion

C. C. Julian Oil & Royalties Co. v. Capshaw

  • 145 Okla. 237
  • 292 P. 841
  • 1930 OK 452
  • 1930 Okla. LEXIS 211
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Oct 14, 1930
Status
Published
On the bench
Andrews, Clark, Cullison, Green, Guy, Heener, Hon, Hunt, Lester, Mason, Oullison, Riley, Swindall, Swinhall
Cited by
35 cases

The opinion

In my judgment the Legislature is empowered with the right to pass laws having for their object the conservation of the natural resources of this state. Oil is one of the natural resources thereof. Conservation statutes must not become the vehicle of monopoly of supply or of prices.

The action of the Corporation Commission directing the shutting down of an oil well or a group of oil wells must be based upon evidence that production beyond the immediate demand and consumption would create a waste in bringing the oil to the surface by producing evaporation, leakage, and other causes.

I think the act of the Legislature, so far as it attempts to properly conserve the oil of the state, is constitutional, and that the orders of the Corporation Commission herein attacked, if erroneous, are subject to appeal from the Corporation Commission to this court.

This court has uniformly hold that the writ of prohibition cannot be substituted for an appeal. The writ should be denied. *Page 256

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.