Opinion

Pettis v. Johnston

  • 78 Okla. 277
  • 190 P. 681
  • 1920 OK 224
  • 1920 Okla. LEXIS 382
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Jun 1, 1920
Status
Published
On the bench
Bailey, Harrison, Higgins, Johnson, McNEILL, Rainey, Ram8ey
Cited by
241 cases

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Hawkins v. Payne, 129 Okla. 243 (1928)

    Pettis v. Johnston, 78 Okla. 277, 190 Pac. 681, is distinguishable from the case at bar in fact, but it supports the rule here followed in paragraph 2, page 284, in holding:
    Supreme Court of OklahomaJan 17, 1928Read it

The opinion

dissents from that part of the opinion which holds extrinsic evidence admissible to contradict the recital in the judgment of service of process though no fraud is charged.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.