Opinion

Haynes v. Board of Trustees of Town of Antlers

  • 192 Okla. 494
  • 137 P.2d 573
  • 1943 OK 189
  • 1943 Okla. LEXIS 215
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
May 18, 1943
Status
Published
On the bench
Corn, Gibson, Riley, Osborn, Bayless, Welch, Hurst, Davison, Arnold
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 0.0%

The opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him, and on September 3, 1942,

*495

duly filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273 , 21 P. 2d 1056 , it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and enter judgment for the defendant.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.