Opinion

Woodworth v. Franklin

  • 85 Okla. 27
  • 204 P. 452
  • 27 A.L.R. 590
  • 1921 OK 333
  • 1921 Okla. LEXIS 63
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Sep 20, 1921
Status
Published
On the bench
Nicholson
Cited by
42 cases

The opinion

On Rehearing.'

PER CURIAM.

Having carefully considered the petition of the defendant in error for a rehearing in this cause, we are satisfied that the former opinion herein is correct, and the petition for rehearing is therefore denied. However, we are of the opinion that said cause should be remanded, with directions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in error and against s'aid defendant in error, canceling the contract between E. E. Evans and the defendant in error, and that a proper accounting be had between the parties hereto, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in error and against the defendant in error for the sum or sums of money received by the defendant in error from the sale of oil or gas from the premises involved, less the actual necessary expenses by him incurred in producing and marketing said oil or gas, and less the fair and reasonable value of any equipment necessary to remain in or about the wells on said premises. And it is so ordered.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.