Opinion

Opinion No. (1979)

Court
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Filed
Jun 11, 1979
Status
Published
On the bench
JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.7%

The opinion

Dear Director Crisp,

The Attorney General has received your request for an opinion wherein you ask the following question:

"In view of Lowery v. Oklahoma Beverage Control Board, Okla., 584 P.2d 720 (1978), is a block, for the purposes of 37 O.S. 534 (c) (1971), to be defined as a linear distance of 300 feet so that a package store may be considered in a different block than a church or school if separated sic by a linear distance greater than 300 feet?"

Title 37 O.S. 534 (c) (1971) states in pertinent part as follows:

"The location of such retail package store is specifically prohibited within three hundred (300) feet from any church property primarily and regularly used for worship services and religious activities, or public school . . . ."

"The distance indicated in this section shall be measured from the nearest property line of such church or school to the nearest public entrance door of the premises of such package store along the street right-of-way line providing the nearest direct route usually traveled by pedestrians between such points. For purposes of determining measured distance, property situated on the opposite side of the street from such church or school shall be considered as if it were located on the same side of the street with such church or school. Provided, a license shall not be issued for a location on any city or town block where a school or church is located." Emphasis added

In Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra at 723 , the Supreme Court of Oklahoma stated:

"We hold the word `block' without modification, under 37 O.S. 534 (c) (1976), means `that portion of a street between two intersecting streets.' See Patterson v. Johnson, supra; People ex rel. Beinert v. Miller, 100 Misc. 318 , 165 N.Y.S. 602 (Sup.Ct.).

"Applying the definition of `block' we have adopted, we hold a street is divided into blocks by its intersections with other streets regardless of whether the intersecting streets completely cross the divided street. See Wise v. City of Chicago et al., 183 Ill. App. 215 .

"We think the legislature intended to treat each linear block as a unit. The block is defined by reference to an intersecting street. Whether the intersecting street crosses the block, or enters the intersected street from either direction is immaterial." Emphasis added

While the Court in Lowery v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, supra, notes that "where a witness uses the term `block' as descriptive of distance the commonly accepted meaning of the term is `300 feet'", such an observation would appear to have been made in support of the Court's conclusion that the term "block" referred to a linear measure as opposed to being descriptive of a square block.

It is, therefore, the opinion of the Attorney General that your question be answered in the negative. A retail liquor store may not be located in the same block as a church or school. A block is defined by reference to intersecting streets, not a linear measurement in feet. For a retail liquor store to be considered in a different block than a church or school, there must be an intersecting street, whether the intersecting street crosses the block or enters the intersected street from either direction being immaterial .

JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA

DUANE N. RASMUSSEN, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.