Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kauer v. Defenbacher

  • 153 Ohio St. 268
  • 153 Ohio St. (N.S.) 268
  • 41 Ohio Op. 278
  • 91 N.E.2d 512
  • 1950 Ohio LEXIS 471
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 22, 1950
Status
Published
Author
Weygandt
On the bench
Taft, Hart, Zimmerman, Stewart, Weygandt, Matthias, Turner, Hast
Cited by
29 cases

Turnpikes are capital outlays

How later courts described this case

  • Turnpikes are capital outlays

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Weygandt, C. J.,

concurring. The question in this case is a simple one.

It is not an over-simplification to state that, reduced to its lowest terms, the problem presented at this time involves merely the authority of the relator as the Director of the Department of Highways of the State of Ohio to use money concededly appropriated by the General Assembly for his use in the “highway improvement fund.” It is conceded, too, that the money is available in that fund. Furthermore, it is not disputed that the proposed turnpike is directly related to the improvement of the highway system of the state. Hence, it would seem that even without the enactment of Section 1220, General Code, the relator possesses the authority to expend available funds for a study of the feasibility of a so-called turnpike or any other project directly related to the improvement of the highway system of the state.

*285

Hast, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.