Opinion

State Ex Rel. Mansfield v. Turnbull

  • 132 Ohio St. 235
  • 132 Ohio St. (N.S.) 235
  • 7 Ohio Op. 542
  • 6 N.E.2d 971
  • 1937 Ohio LEXIS 265
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
Mar 4, 1937
Status
Published
Author
Day
On the bench
Jones, Day, Weygandt, Matthias, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers
Cited by
4 cases

Distinguished

  • Distinguished by Acford v. Auditor of Cambridge, 300 Mass. 391 (1938)

    The cases of People v. Harburger, 132 App. Div. (N. Y.) 260, and State v. Turnbull, 132 Ohio St. 235, relied upon by the respondent, are distinguishable in the facts from the case at bar.
    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial CourtMay 26, 1938Read it

The opinion

Day, J.,

dissenting. Section 486-176, General Code,

*244

pertaining to police officers and firemen, provides that should a vacancy occur through death within two years from the date of lay-off, the oldest employee in point of service of those laid off shall he entitled to fill same, providing he was at the time of his separation a regular and permanent employee.

In the agreed statement of facts it is admitted that a vacancy occurred within two years from the date of the temporary lay-off of decedent, Elvin C. Mansfield; that he was the oldest employee in the point of police service of those laid off, and at the time of his separation from service he was a regular and permanent employee.

In the writer’s opinion, under the statute, Elvin C. Mansfield clearly became entitled to fill the vacancy created in the police department and to the rights and benefits consequent thereunder. He was denied this right because his state of health was such as would incapacitate him from performing the duties attaching to the position. However, nowhere in the statute, either expressly or by implication, is the state of health of a laid-off police officer made a- qualifying condition for reinstatement, and no such condition should be en-grafted upon it. To. do so would be tantamount to amending an act of the General Assembly by judicial legislation. The only qualifying conditions contained in the statute are those referred to above. There are no others.

Where a laid-off police officer fulfills the qualifying conditions imposed by statute, his right to fill the vacancy created in the police department, and all rights and benefits accruing to him and his dependents thereunder, become absolute; and when such rights and benefits are denied, their exaction ought to be made possible to the police officer during his lifetime, and to his widow and dependents after his death, by a writ of mandamus.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.