Opinion

Shaper v. Tracy

  • 97 Ohio App. 3d 760
  • 647 N.E.2d 550
  • 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 4358
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Sep 29, 1994
Status
Published
Author
Bryant
On the bench
Young, Bryant, Mahoney, Ninth
Cited by
6 cases

discussing Bonaparte's holding and noting that it was not based on the Commerce Clause

How later courts described this case

  • discussing Bonaparte's holding and noting that it was not based on the Commerce Clause

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Peggy Bryant, Judge,

concurring.

Concurring in the majority’s analysis of appellant’s contentions under the Commerce Clause, and the majority’s determination that its conclusion under the Commerce Clause renders her arguments under Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code moot, I thus concur in the majority’s holding that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.