Opinion

Goe v. Goe, 2006ca00341 (12-17-2007)

  • 2007 Ohio 6767
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 17, 2007
Status
Published
On the bench
DELANEY, J.
Cited by
1 cases

The opinion

{¶ 43} I concur in the majority's analysis and disposition of Appellant's second and third assignments of error.

{¶ 44} I disagree with the majority's reason for overruling Appellant's first assignment of error. I do not find Appellant's failure to file objections to the magistrate's temporary orders waives his right to challenge that order as being vague and ambiguous in a subsequent contempt proceeding for willful violation of that order. Therefore, I concur in judgment only in overruling Appellant's first assignment of error. *Page 1

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.