explaining that trial court’s order allegedly misinterpreting the scope of Crim.R. 16 was subject to de novo review
How later courts described this case
- explaining that trial court’s order allegedly misinterpreting the scope of Crim.R. 16 was subject to de novo review
- collecting state and federal cases addressing materiality of real world deployment *111 records
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Singer, Judge,
concurring.
{¶ 65} I concur in the decision and finding of this court. In addition, I would follow the suggestion in
United States v. Wood,
915 F.Supp. at 1136, as cited in Judge Handwork’s decision. A challenge to reliability, based on the quality of the training of both the dog and the handler, the health of the drug dog, or any other factor particular to the facts of the case that could call into question the reliability of the search should not be foreclosed.