Opinion

Grant v. Washington Twp.

  • 1 Ohio App. 2d 84
  • 30 Ohio Op. 2d 108
  • 203 N.E.2d 859
  • 1963 Ohio App. LEXIS 627
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Feb 13, 1963
Status
Published
Author
Bryant
On the bench
Dufeey, Duffy, Duffey, Bryant, Tenth
Cited by
23 cases

holding that without a transcript before it, the court of common pleas had no authority to proceed at all under R.C. 2505.06

How later courts described this case

  • holding that without a transcript before it, the court of common pleas had no authority to proceed at all under R.C. 2505.06
  • "remedy for an inadequate transcript is to file a R.C. 2506.03 (A
  • “the mere filing of an affidavit does not automatically * * * compel the Court of Common Pleas to take additional evidence unless the record will support some one of the deficiencies enumerated in the statute”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Bryant, J.,

dissenting. I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. As I see it, the rejections of the application for rezoning by the township zoning authorities and the rejection by the township trustees represent a gross abuse of discretion, were arbitrary and high-handed, and the court below was correct in striking them down.

Duffey, P. J., Duffy and Bryant, JJ., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the Second Appellate District.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.