Opinion

State v. Condon

  • 157 Ohio App. 3d 26
  • 2004 Ohio 2031
  • 808 N.E.2d 912
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Apr 23, 2004
Status
Published
Author
Painter
On the bench
Doan, Painter, Hildebrandt
Cited by
21 cases

finding newly discovered evidence when “[t]he defendant did not know that the witness would ultimately testify in his favor”

How later courts described this case

  • finding newly discovered evidence when “[t]he defendant did not know that the witness would ultimately testify in his favor”

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Painter, Judge,

concurring separately.

{¶ 28} I concur in Judge Doan’s opinion. Sometimes the minority rule is correct. We have all but ordered the trial court to grant a new trial. And the new trial should be scheduled immediately — Condon starts serving his sentence for this count next week.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.