The opinion
WILLIAMS, J.
I concur in the reversal of the judgment of the courts below upon the ground that the judgment in the prohate court was prematurely entered in that there had been no finding for or against the improvement under 6894-7 GC., but am of the opinion that the verdict of the jury finding the amount due for land to be taken for road improvement should not be set aside because it is not erroneous for any reasons as to the issues submitted, and that the case should be remanded with directions to the trial court to submit to the determination of a jury, whether or not -the' improvement petitioned for will-be conducive to the-public convenience and -welfare.