Opinion

State v. Nelson

  • 122 Ohio App. 3d 309
  • 701 N.E.2d 747
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Aug 6, 1996
Status
Published
Author
Farmer
On the bench
Hoffman, Gwin, Farmer
Cited by
13 cases
Authority
More cited than 43.1%

holding that felonious assault is not a lesser-included offense of attempted murder

How later courts described this case

  • holding that felonious assault is not a lesser-included offense of attempted murder

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

*316

Farmer, Judge,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. In Assignment of Error III, the majority holds that felonious assault, R.C. 2903.11(A)(2), fails by definition to be a lesser included offense of attempted murder because attempted murder can, as statutory defined, be committed without the lesser offense. I disagree with this analysis as it pertains to felonious assault as defined by subsection (A)(2). The legislature built into subsection (A)(2) the attempt language without the necessity of a charge under the section prohibiting an attempt to commit an offense. By its very nature, the felonious assault statute is a compilation of various crimes included under the broad definition of felonious assault.

The majority makes the statement that one can attempt to cause someone’s death by pushing him/her out of a window and it would not be felonious assault. I disagree because this analysis forces a court to look at the particular facts, which the majority claims the

dicta

in

State v. Koss

(1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 213 , 551 N.E.2d 970 , prohibits.

1

If the “facts” were attempted murder by pushing someone out of a window, felonious assault as statutorily defined under the subsection (A)(1) phrase “[clause serious physical harm to another” would apply.

Also, although it was decided prior to

Deem,

I find

State v. Mabry

(1982), 5 Ohio App.3d 13 , 5 OBR 14, 449 N.E.2d 16 , to be persuasive. Our sister court from the Eighth District found felonious assault to be a lesser included offense of attempted murder by using the same analysis as the

Deem

court at paragraph two of the syllabus. The court reaffirmed its position after

Deem

in

State v. Whalen

(Nov. 27, 1991), Cuyahoga App. No. 59366, unreported, 1991 WL 251668 .

I find R.C. 2903.11(A)(2), felonious assault, to be a lesser included offense of attempted murder. Therefore, the trial court did not err in giving the instruction on felonious assault. I would deny the assignment of error.

1

. The step-by-step analysis of

Deem

at paragraph three of the syllabus was not included in the

Koss

syllabus. The majority relies on the dicta of

Koss

and not its holding.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.