Opinion

Cameron v. Ohio Department of Transportation

  • 108 Ohio App. 3d 20
  • 669 N.E.2d 874
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Dec 22, 1995
Status
Published
Author
Glasser
On the bench
Resnick, Sherck, Glasser
Cited by
4 cases

whether conduct constitutes a violation of R.C. 124.34 is a question of law

How later courts described this case

  • whether conduct constitutes a violation of R.C. 124.34 is a question of law

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

Glasser, Judge,

dissenting.

I must respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority. The issue before this court in this administrative appeal is whether the common pleas court abused its discretion in concluding that the determination of the board was supported by rehable, probative and substantial evidence and was in accordance with law. In my view, the record in this matter supports the board’s decision. Moreover, by finding that the board’s decision was not in accordance with law, the majority has weighed the evidence and reached a conclusion different from that of the board. It is not within our province to reach different conclusions on factual issues. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the common pleas court.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.