Opinion

Livisay v. Ohio Board of Dietetics

  • 73 Ohio App. 3d 288
  • 596 N.E.2d 1129
  • 1991 Ohio App. LEXIS 2052
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Apr 25, 1991
Status
Published
Author
Whiteside
On the bench
McCormac, McKinley, Whiteside, Pleas, Tenth
Cited by
5 cases

The opinion

Whiteside, Judge,

concurring.

Although I concur in the judgment, there is an additional reason for the result. The words “acceptable to the board” in R.C. 4759.06(D) modify the words “another related field” not the word “degree.” In other words, the duty of the board is to determine what fields are sufficiently related to nutrition so as to permit a degree in that field to be substituted for one in nutrition. It is not the function of the board to examine the courses taken in order to obtain a particular degree in an approved field so long as the institution granting the degree is approved by a recognized regional accreditation agency.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.