Opinion

Spring Hill Nurseries, Inc. v. Limbach

  • 75 Ohio App. 3d 460
  • 599 N.E.2d 818
  • 1991 Ohio App. LEXIS 3803
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Aug 7, 1991
Status
Published
Author
Wolff
On the bench
Brogan, Grady, Wolff
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Wolff, Judge,

concurring separately.

I would overrule the second assignment of error. In my judgment, the board reasonably concluded that the sales occurred when Spring Hill acknowl

*466

edged its customers’ orders. The board could have reasonably determined that mutuality of obligation arose at the time of these occurrences. See R.C. 5739.01(0). I otherwise concur in the majority opinion to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the foregoing, and I concur in the judgment.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.