failure to assert the right to cross-examine affiants
How later courts described this case
- failure to assert the right to cross-examine affiants
- “[I]f a party does not object to alleged errors ... at an administrative hearing, he waives his right to raise those errors on appeal.”
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
Corrigan, J.,
concurring. I concur with the holding herein that the injunction issued by this court stayed the order below and thus rendered the action of the Council of the city of Fair-view Park void. Further, I agree that
*39
this matter must be remanded for a hearing in which appellant may cross-examine the witnesses and it is my opinion that all the interested parties may offer new or additional evidence.
Dudukovich
v.
Housing Authority
(1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 202, 206-207 , 12 O.O. 3d 198, 201-202, 389 N.E. 2d 1113, 1116-1117 ;
Cahill
v.
Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals
(1986), 30 Ohio App. 3d 236, 237 , 30 OBR 394, 395, 507 N.E. 2d 411, 413 (both construing R.C. 2506.03).