Opinion

Hoeflinger v. West Clermont Local Board of Education

17 Ohio App. 3d 145
17 Ohio B. 245
478 N.E.2d 251
1984 Ohio App. LEXIS 12456

Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed: Jun 18, 1984
Status: Published
Author: Hendrickson
On the bench: Hendrickson, Koehler, Jones
Cited by: 2 cases

The opinion

Hendrickson, P.J.,

concurring. There is, of course, no question that the school administrative officer has the discretion pursuant to the provisions of R.C. 3319.141 either to grant, or to refuse the request for the use of sick leave for pregnancy, but R.C. 3319.141 gives no authority for the administrative officer to require a statement from the employee’s physician before acting upon that request. Consequently, the denial of. sick leave to appellant upon the basis that she failed to furnish such a statement is contrary to the express provisions of the statute. Therefore, since the

*150

record discloses no other reason for the denial of the use of sick leave for pregnancy, the judgment must be reversed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.