Opinion

Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

  • 66 Ohio App. 3d 826
  • 4 Ohio App. Unrep. 352
  • 586 N.E.2d 1121
  • 1990 Ohio App. LEXIS 2373
Court
Ohio Court of Appeals
Filed
Jun 13, 1990
Status
Published
Author
Quillin
On the bench
Reece, Quillin, Baird
Cited by
275 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.6%

The opinion

QUILLIN, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part.

I agree that R.C. 4123.56 applies even though the injury pre-dated the statute I also agree that

Balyint

v.

Arkansas Best Freight Systems, Inc.

(1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 126 applies. I disagree with the majority's application of

Balyint .

When the six separate opinions in

Balyint

are ready together,

Balyint

stands for the proposition that when a self-insurer intentionally and wrongfully terminates worker's compensation payments, the employee may have a bad faith claim under the rationale of

Hoskins

v.

Aetna Life Ins.

Co.(1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 272 .

That being so, summary judgment in favor of Goodyear was correct as to the first and third causes of action but incorrect as to the second cause of action.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.