Opinion

Hunt Manufacturing Co. v. Hudson

  • 200 N.C. 541
  • 157 S.E. 799
  • 1931 N.C. LEXIS 382
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Apr 1, 1931
Status
Published
Author
Stacy
On the bench
Stacy
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 50.2%

The opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The National Surety Company takes the position that only one action, in the nature of a creditor’s bill, can be brought to enforce the surety’s liability on a contractor’s bond, given to a municipal corporation in connection with public work under C. S., 2445, as amended, and that such action, as provided therein, must “be brought in

*543

tbe county in wbicb tbe building, road, or street is located, and not elsewhere.” Tbis is true, but tbe provisions of tbis statute would seem to be inapplicable to tbe present case.

In tbe first place, tbe plaintiff’s cause of action is not limited to recovery on tbe contractor’s bond. Another and independent agreement is set out and declared upon. In tbe second place, O. S., 2445, applies only to bonds given to municipal corporations, and while “Tbe Board of Trustees of tbe East Carolina Teachers’ College” is declared a body corporate by 3 C. S., 5863, such board, we apprehend, is not a municipal corporation within tbe purview of C. S., 2445. A similar bolding was made with respect to tbe North Carolina State Highway Commission in

Trust Co. v. Highway Commission,

190 N. C., 680 , 130 S. E., 547 .

Tbe motion to dismiss tbe action was properly overruled.

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.