Opinion

Arrington v. . Arrington

  • 114 N.C. 151
  • 19 S.E. 351
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Feb 5, 1894
Status
Published
On the bench
Shepherd
Cited by
34 cases
Authority
More cited than 42.5%

The opinion

This appeal relates solely to mill tract, situated in Franklin County. The purchasers of this tract paid full value and without actual notice. At the time of the purchase (176) there was only a judgment against the executors in Franklin County. This judgment, we have seen in the discussion of the third general proposition in the opinion in the foregoing appeal, was not constructive notice, unless actual knowledge of its existence was brought home to the purchasers. The exception is overruled.

Both of these cases are remanded in order that judgments may be entered in accordance with the opinions of the Court.

Remanded.

Cited: Bunn v. Todd , 115 N.C. 142 ; Puryear v. Sanford , 124 N.C. 282 ; Bird v. Gilliam , 125 N.C. 79 ; Harris v. Davenport , 132 N.C. 701 ; Morgan v. Bostic, ib. , 752; Arrington v. Arrington , 142 N.C. 130 ; Dew v. Pyke , 145 N.C. 305 ; Culbreth v. Hall , 159 N.C. 592 ; Lee v. Giles , 161 N.C. 546 , 548 ; Lamm v. Lamm , 163 N.C. 74 ; Lanier v. Lumber Co. , 177 N.C. 205 . *Page 112

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.