Opinion

Crabtree v. . Sheelky

  • 118 N.C. 104
  • 23 S.E. 927
Court
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Filed
Feb 5, 1896
Status
Published
On the bench
PER CURIAM:
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon reading the affidavit and hearing the motion of defendant for a new hearing for newly discovered testimony, it is ordered in the exercise of the discretion ary power of the Court that the judgment be reversed and the sale be set aside.

Brown

v.

Mitchell,

102 N. C., 347 .

The suggestion is made that the court below inquire whether the true interest of all parties would not be promoted by a sale of the property in separate lots.

New Hearing.

*

*

It was held in

Brown

v. Mitchell, that new hearing's or new trials granted by the Appellate Court in the exercise of its ‘discretion for newly discovered testimony would not be reported as precedents.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.